Comparative Analysis of Knowledge, Awareness and Practice towards rational use of face masks between healthcare and non-healthcare individuals during the COVID-19 Pandemic

 

Vigneshwaran Easwaran1, Mantargi Mohammad Jaffar Sadiq2, Sirajudeen Shaik Alavudeen1, Sultan Mohammed Alshahrani1, Noohu Abdulla Khan1, Thamineni Rajavardhana3,

Malini Sivasankara Pillai4

1Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy,

King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

2Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Batterjee Medical College,

Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

3Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice,

Balaji College of Pharmacy, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

4Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Triveni institute of Pharmacy, Thrissur, Kerala, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: vbagyalakshmi@kku.edu.sa

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: During the current pandemic, the use of face masks is considered one of the major preventive strategies to control the spread of virus. The improper use of face masks may lead to serious consequences. The rational use of face masks requires an appropriate knowledge and awareness. It may vary between the health care and non-health care individuals.  Aims: To explore the knowledge, awareness and practice towards the rational use and disposal of face masks among health care and non-health care individuals. Methodology: It is a cross sectional questionnaire based study conducted among the selected towns of five different states of south India. The study participants were grouped into healthcare professionals (Group 1) non-health care individuals (Group 2). The frequency of correct responses to all the items were calculated individually for both the groups and was compared by using chi square test. Results: A total of 128 health care professionals and 301 non health care individuals were included in this study. The majority of the subjects in group 1 uses medical/surgical mask or N95 masks, whereas the group 2 subjects uses cloth/fabric masks. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of knowledge and awareness about the use and disposal of face masks. Conclusion: This study revealed that both the group members were having enough knowledge, awareness and practice towards the appropriate use of face masks. The knowledge and awareness about the used face mask disposal is minimal.

 

KEYWORDS: Face Mask, Rational Use, Disposal, Knowledge, Awareness.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

COVID 19 virus continues to spread globally, posing a serious threat to mankind and caused challenges to health care professionals.1 The pandemic also changed lifestyle and hygienic practices among people.2 The interventions such as using face masks, hands washing, lockdowns, physical distancing and other hygiene measures are considered as major preventive strategy.3,4

 

 

In this regard many countries have mandated the use of face masks among the public and health care workers.5,6 Face masks have traditionally been used in general infection control.7 Improper disposal of face mask is a great environmental threat and shall be considered as biomedical hazard.8,9 Pandemic has increased the demand, usage and disposal of face masks. Community had not faced such huge use of face mask use in recent  hundred years. Disposal of facemask in health care settings by the healthcare professional might be easy and manageable but it may not be properly done by the non-healthcare individuals in public due to lacuna in knowledge and regulations. The knowledge on household waste and medical waste disposal among the public is low in the selected population.10,11 By considering this, public awareness and practice on proper disposal of face mask is a great question mark.12 The rational use of face masks requires an appropriate knowledge and awareness and it may vary between the health care and non-health care individuals. Therefore, it is essential to explore the existing knowledge, awareness and practice towards the rational use and disposal of face masks between health care and non-health care individuals.13,14 Thus the current study was designed to compare the knowledge, awareness and practice among health care and non-health care individuals towards rational use and disposal of face masks.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Study design and sample:

It is a cross sectional questionnaire based study conducted among the selected towns of five different states of south India. The study duration was three months between July and August 2020. The current study utilised the non-probabilistic convenient sampling technique. The subjects those who were 18 years and above were included in the study. Participants from both the gender were invited to participate in the survey irrespective of their demographic characteristics. The electronic survey was created using google forms and was circulated through various social media platforms. Grouping: The participants in the survey were grouped into health care professionals and non-healthcare individuals based on their response. The health care professionals included both healthcare students and the practicing physicians, nurses, pharmacists and physiotherapists (128 subjects – Group 1) and non-health care individuals included common public (301 subjects - Group 2).

 

Questionnaire and data collection:

The questionnaire assessed the knowledge and attitude on usage and disposal of face masks which was distributed in local regional languages (Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam) and English as well. The questionnaire was prepared by referring to various published literatures and world health organization guidelines. The pilot study was conducted to estimate the content validity. The questionnaire was originally prepared in English and was translated to regional languages in south India. The language validation was done by using back translation method. The items included in the questionnaire were mixed model. Total of 31 items were included along with one item dedicated for informed consent. The sections included in the questionnaire are demographic characteristics (9 items), type of face mask use (1 item), attitude on usage of face mask (12 items) and knowledge and attitude on disposal of face mask (9 items).

 

Ethical considerations:

The study was approved by institutional review board of Balaji college of pharmacy and the approval # is IRB/2020/BCP-PD/32. The data are kept confidentially and all the subjects were free to participate or not to participate in the study by providing an electronic consent.

 

Statistical analysis:

The data were downloaded from the google survey as excel file and was exported to statistical package for social sciences (SPSS), version 22.0 for Windows for statistical analysis. The descriptive statistics were used to illustrate the demographic characteristics. The comparison between healthcare and non-healthcare individuals for the frequency of correct responses to the questionnaire was tested by using χ2 test. P value was considered significant if < 0.05.

 

RESULTS:

Overall 442 subjects responded the survey. Out of which only 429 responses were included for the final analysis. Remaining responses were excluded due to incomplete data or disagreement with the consent. The study included 128 health care professionals and 301 non health care individuals. The scale reliability coefficient was found to be 0.56 for comparison of appropriate usage of face masks among health care professionals and non-health care individuals. The majority of the study subjects were in the age group of 18 – 25 years (43.8 % and 65.1 % in group 1 and group 2 respectively). The majority of the participants in group 2 were females. The distribution of gender was equal in group 1. Overall, 91 % of study subjects from both the groups were living with their families. 100% and 95.7 % of study subjects from group 1 and 2 had completed their college /university level education. Among all the participants, around 50.8% of the study subjects were students and 37.8 % of subjects were salaried workers. In group 1, more than 40% of the subjects were earning 20,000 Indian rupees and above per month, whereas in group 2, majority of the subjects were earning an monthly income of 10,000 – 20,000 Indian rupees per month (37.9%) and around one quarter (28.6 %) of the respondents’ income was less than 5000 Indian rupees per month. Table 1. 


 

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the study subjects

Characteristics

Group 1 (HCP)

Frequency (%) N=128

Group 2 (Non-HCP)

Frequency (%) N=301

Total

Frequency (%)

Age in years

18-25

56 (43.8)

196 (65.1)

252 (58.7)

26-35

43 (33.6)

46 (15.3)

89 (20.7)

36-45

23 (18.0)

38 (12.6)

61 (14.2)

46-50

3 (2.3)

8 (2.7)

11 (2.6)

>50

3 (2.3)

13 (4.3)

16 (3.7)

Gender

Male

64 (50.0)

92 (30.6)

156 (36.4)

Female

64 (50.0)

209 (69.4)

273 (63.6)

Living Status

Alone

27 (21.1)

12 (4.0)

39 (9.1)

With Family

101 (78.9)

289 (96.0)

390 (90.9)

Education

No formal education

0 (.0)

1 (.3)

1 (0.2)

Primary school

0 (.0)

2 (.7)

2 (0.5)

Secondary school

0 (0.0)

10 (3.3)

10 (2.3)

College / University

128 (100.0)

288 (95.7)

416 (97)

Occupation

Student

33 (25.8)

185 (61.5)

218 (50.8)

Home maker

1 (.8)

23 (7.6)

24 (5.6)

Farmer

0 (0)

2 (.7)

2 (.5)

Salaried

89 (69.5)

73 (24.3)

162 (37.8)

Not working

5 (3.9)

18 (6.0)

23 (5.4)

Monthly Income (Indian Rupees)

Less than 5000

15 (11.7)

86 (28.6)

101 (23.5)

5000-10000

20 (15.6)

46 (15.3)

66 (15.4)

10000-20000

38 (29.7)

114 (37.9)

152 (35.4)

More than 20000

55 (43.0)

55 (18.3)

110 (25.6)

Familial Covid history

No

110 (85.9)

284 (94.4)

394 (91.8)

Yes

18 (14.1)

17 (5.6)

35 (8.2)

 


The majority of the subjects included in the group 1 were using medical or surgical mask and N 95 mask (43% and 21.1%), whereas the group 2 were using cloth or fabric mask to protect themselves from COVID 19 (61.1%). 2.3% of subjects from both the groups are using hand kerchief or shawl or Burkha Nakab. Figure 1.

 

Figure 1: Type of facemasks used by the study subjects

 

Table 2 provides the results for the comparison of frequency of correct responses to the questions  related to the knowledge and practice on the usage of face mask. The results revealed that the responses of the participants from both the groups did not show any  statistically significant difference for the majority of the items in the questionnaire..  Nearly 80% of the study subjects in both the groups tend to wash their hands before  using face masks (P=0.690). More than 30% of the study subjects reported that they were not covering their face or chin or nose while using face masks. It was found that more than 90% of the study subjects in both the groups were washing their reusable face masks regularly, and nearly 60% of them were doing it on daily basis (P = 0.796). Nearly all the study subjects from both the groups were not sharing their face mask with others and not removing their face masks while talking to an unknown person. However, around 10% of the study subjects reported removing their mask while talking to their friends or their colleagues. On the other hand, around 28% of the study subjects reported reusing their medical or surgical face mask. There was a significant difference in ensuring the colored side of the medical/surgical masks facing outside between two groups(P=0.003), where the healthcare professionals were more knowledgeable in this aspect.


 

Table 2: knowledge and attitudes on appropriate usage of Face mask

Items

Response

Group 1

Frequency (%)

Group 2

Frequency (%)

Total

Frequency (%)

P value

Do you wash your hands before start using face mask?

Correct

105 (82)

241 (80)

346 (81)

0.690

Wrong

23 (18)

60 (20)

83 (19)

While using face mask, do you uncover any one of the following? Face or chin or nose.

Correct

87 (68)

203 (67)

290 (68)

1.000

Wrong

41 (32)

98 (33)

139 (32)

Do you frequently touch the face mask, preferably on the front side?

Correct

100 (78)

238 (79)

338 (79)

0.897

Wrong

28 (22)

63 (21)

91 (21)

When you are using cloth/fabric mask, do you wash the mask with the detergent when you want to reuse it?

Correct

111 (87)

277 (92)

388 (90)

0.106

Wrong

17 (13)

24 (8)

41 (10)

How often do you wash your Cloth/Fabric mask?

Correct

86 (67)

198 (66)

284 (66)

0.796

Wrong

27 (21)

69 (23)

96 (22)

Do you wash your hands after removing the face mask?

Correct

115 (90)

276 (92)

391 (91)

0.578

Wrong

13 (10)

25 (8)

38 (9)

Do you wear a loose mask?

Correct

116 (91)

268 (89)

384 (90)

0.731

Wrong

12 (9)

33 (11)

45 (10)

Do you share your mask with others?

 

Correct

127 (99)

297 (99)

424 (99)

1.000

Wrong

1 (1)

4 (1)

5 (1)

Do you wear a mask under the nose?

 

Correct

108 (84)

264 (88)

372 (87)

0.354

Wrong

20 (16)

37 (12)

57 (13)

Do you remove mask when you are talking with unknown person?

Correct

128 (100)

297 (99)

425 (99)

0.322

Wrong

0 (0)

4 (1)

4 (1)

Do you remove mask when you are talking with your friends or office colleagues?

Correct

119 (93)

267 (89)

386 (90)

0.220

Wrong

9 (7)

34 (11)

43 (10)

Do you reuse the Medical/Surgical mask?

 

Correct

93 (73)

214 (71)

307 (72)

0.815

Wrong

35 (27)

87 (29)

122 (28)

If you use Medical/Surgical mask, do you ensure colored side faces outwards?

Correct

95 (74)

177 (59)

272 (63)

0.003*

Wrong

33 (26)

124 (41)

157 (37)

* P value <0.05 considered significant. Chi square test.

 


Table 3 provides the comparative details of two groups regarding the appropriate disposal of face mask. The study result does not show any statistically significant difference for most of the items included in this section. It is unfortunate that more than 60% of study subjects from both the groups were unaware of the appropriate duration of medical or surgical face mask use (P =0.502). Even though the analysis is statistically not significant, a considerable amount of subjects were touching the front side of face mask while removing it (20%). The results showed that, the majority of the subjects in both the groups were not using tissue or gloves while removing the face mask. It was found that 80% of the study subjects were discarding the face masks appropriately into the trash bin. We found the statistically significant difference in terms of disposal of wet or damaged face masks between health care professionals and non-health care individuals (P =0.018). Nearly 90% of the study subjects were well aware of the fact that,  discarding the face masks in an improper way may lead to potential health hazards and the  pathogens in the improperly discarded face masks can survive for hours.  Nearly 42% of study subjects in both the groups were found not following the proper disposal technique (several fold method) of face masks to avoid the exposure of pathogens to the environment.


 

Table 3: Knowledge and attitudes on appropriate disposal of face mask

Items

Response

Group 1

Frequency (%)

Group 2

Frequency (%)

Total

Frequency (%)

P value

Approximately, How long the Medical/Surgical face masks can be used?

Correct

46 (36)

97 (32)

143 (33)

0.502

Wrong

82 (64)

204 (68)

286 (67)

While you remove your mask, will you touch front side of the mask with your bare hands?

Correct

106 (83)

247 (82)

353 (82)

0.891

Wrong

22 (17)

54 (18)

76 (18)

Do you use gloves or tissues to remove face mask?

Correct

31 (24)

55 (18)

86 (20)

0.187

Wrong

97 (76)

246 (82)

343 (80)

Do you throw your face mask in an open environment or in open trash bin after its usage?

Correct

100 (78)

249 (83)

349 (81)

0.280

Wrong

28 (22)

52 (17)

80 (19)

Do you discard the face mask, if it is wet or damaged?

Correct

114 (89)

239 (79)

353 (82)

0.018*

Wrong

14 (11)

62 (21)

76 (18)

Do you think improperly discarded face masks has potential health hazards?

Correct

117 (91)

268 (89)

385 (90)

0.602

Wrong

11 (9)

33 (11)

44 (10)

Do you think pathogens can survive for long hours in used face masks?

Correct

117 (91)

272 (90)

389 (91)

0.857

Wrong

11 (9)

29 (10)

40 (9)

After usage, do you leave your mask within the reach of others?

Correct

120 (94)

273 (91)

393 (92)

0.346

Wrong

8 (6)

28 (9)

36 (8)

Do you fold inwards (possibly several folds) and discard your mask to avoid the pathogens being exposed outside?

Correct

74 (58)

175 (58)

249 (58)

1.000

Wrong

54 (42)

126 (42)

180 (42)

* P value <0.05 considered significant. Chi square test.

 

DISCUSSION:

Several published literatures from Asia estimated the knowledge, attitude and practice on COVID 19 and other medical waste management among healthcare and non-healthcare individuals but not specifically about face masks.15-19 To our knowledge, this is the first published research study estimated the knowledge and awareness on rational use of face masks and disposal, among the health care and non-healthcare individuals particularly during this ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in south India. People around the world are driven by their governments to wear face masks along with other precautionary measures to contain the spread of this disease.20

 

Various awareness and educational programs are being conducted to the public to provide proper guidance on the  rational use and disposal of face masks. Moreover, the fundamental healthcare education provides a deep understanding towards the same to the healthcare professionals as it comes as the part of their feature. The current pandemic has narrowed the gap between the healthcare and non-healthcare individuals in combating COVID 19, where the use of face masks become mandatory.20 Hence, evaluation of rational use of face masks and their disposal by the people living in a community was undertaken in the current study by dividing them in to sects, per se, for the sake of deriving an understanding.

 

It was evident from our results that the non-healthcare individuals use the non-medical face masks including piece of clothes, face veils, hand kerchiefs, scarfs, etc., which reflects their negligence towards battle against COVID 19. The Canadian center for occupational health and safety  reiterates that not all the fabrics used to cover the face provide the protection in the same way as the surgical masks do.21 Continuous use of non-recommended fabrics may jeopardize the health of the individual, family and the community as they are not up to the standards, and are not designed to fit the face tight enough to provide the required protection against COVID 19.22  Instead, the only advantage of these fabrics, if worn, are that they limit the spread of the droplets when sneezed or coughed in a public area to some extent, where social distancing is not possible,23 whereas, the spread of the disease is well controlled with medical facemasks than the fabric cloths.22  In this regard, the respirators are given 95% higher ratings in terms of safety and efficiency against protecting the individual who wears it.21,24,25

 

Awareness regarding the usage of the face masks among the given participants was at acceptable limit.26,27 In terms of knowledge and awareness on using face masks, the responses were nearly the same in both the groups, except selecting the appropriate front side of the face masks by differentiating the color of the surface and many participants have reflected an idea that they chose to use the facemask even if it is wet or damaged.

 

While discussing the face masks as a tool for prevention of this pandemic, the disposal of the used face masks should not be neglected. A recent research, which studied the  disposal of medical waste in Asian countries in the current pandemic suggested a strict guidelines for medical waste management should be implemented.28 In the current study, though the study subjects have known some ideas on how to dispose the used face masks, there is a shortfall in terms of method of disposal or awareness on existing guidelines with regards to disposal of face masks. Earlier, the guidelines on medical waste management were taught only for the healthcare professionals, but now it is required for common public as well, and at least for the face masks, since the use of face masks is very well increased among common public during the current pandemic, though initially face mask use among public was not preferred by the experts due to the reason of self-contamination.29

 

In contrast to a Bangladesh study, which ascertained the knowledge and practice on medical waste management was insufficient among health care workers in Bangladesh due to lack of financial support.30 It is satisfying that the healthcare professionals in our study  possess an adequate knowledge regarding the disposal of face masks and it can be extended to the  non-healthcare individuals with the help of personnel and financial support from the government. 

 

The responses from the participants clearly show that there are some pitfalls in using and disposing the face masks in an appropriate way, which need to be improved. Since the pandemic forced most of the common public and some of the healthcare professionals to wear the face masks without prior experience or practice, it is necessary to conduct awareness programs on “how to use the face masks’ in an appropriate way.

 

Our study had explored few irrational practices of using face mask. So, the findings of our study will help the healthcare authorities in designing an awareness program with the inclusion of the above discussed issues. Besides, the published studies revealed that the people are willing to change their behavior to combat COVID 19 infection.31 In addition it was highly recommended by many of the researchers that a community based awareness program followed by a structured educational leaflets distribution must be taken up to bring the awareness and seriousness regarding the usage and disposal of face masks among both the common public and the healthcare professionals. 32,33,34

A pandemic with the irrational human intervention with the improper usage and disposal of the after use face masks may act as curse on us leading the mankind to combat the situation without many gains. Maintaining the highest possible sterile environment or controlled situations cannot guarantee the control of spread of infections at community level.35 A proper awareness among the public towards the same may create cautious application and develops responsibility towards battling the notorious diseases like COVID – 19. One who lacks the knowledge can gain from a knowledgeable provider for the fruitful outcomes.   

 

CONCLUSION:

The study explored that both health care and non-health care individuals were having enough knowledge and positive attitude towards the appropriate usage and disposal of face masks and found highest among young and college going participants. Still there are areas which need to be focused and improved by educating the general public, which may upgrade their knowledge and awareness regarding facemasks in the prevention of communicable diseases including COVID 19. State government agencies has to develop proper awareness and scientific disposal methods for disposing used face masks. One area of prime most important and needed improvement is the change in the attitude of acceptance of threat and managing it and the awareness programs related to the same must be included in the national health policies.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this research.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Vishakantamurthy DG. Hemeshamurthy. Jayashree R. A Study to Assess the Knowledge, attitude and practice of Nursing officers Regarding Covid-19 at selected Covid Care Centre, Chamarajanagar. Asian Journal of Nursing Education and Research. 2021; 11(3):351-4. https://doi.org/10.52711/2349-2996.2021.00084.

2.      Jain SR. Jain GT. Ishikar KS. Impact of Covid-19 on Changing Habits and Health Issues of the Public. Asian Journal of Management. 2020;11(4):524-528. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-5763.2020.00077.3.

3.      Ahmad S. Shoaib A. Ali S. Alam S. et al. Epidemiology, risk, myths, pharmacotherapeutic management and socio economic burden due to novel COVID-19: A recent update. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(9):4435-42. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00784.2.

4.      Kishor RS, Ramhari BM. Introduction to Covid-19. Research J. Science and Tech. 2020; 12(4):338-45. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-2988.2020.00051.0.

5.      MacIntyre CR. Cauchemez S. Dwyer DE. Seale H. et al. Face Mask Use and Control of Respiratory Virus Transmission in Households. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(2):233–41. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1502.081167.

6.      Lepelletier D. Grandbastien B. Romano-Bertrand Sara. Aho Serge. et al. What face mask for what use in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic? The French guidelines. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2020;105(3):414–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.036. 

7.      Brienen NCJ. Timen A. Wallinga J. Van Steen Bergen JE. et al. The Effect of Mask Use on the Spread of Influenza During a Pandemic: The Effect of Mask Use on the Spread of Influenza During a Pandemic. Risk Analysis. 2010;30(8):1210–18. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1539-6924.2010.01428.x. 

8.      Ramkrishna M, Satyanarayana P. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) Study Regarding Bio-Medical Waste Management Among Staff in a Tertiary Care Hospital at Andhra Pradesh. Asian Journal of Management. 2018; 9(1):267-71. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-5763.2018.00040.9. 

9.      Chauiyakh O. Et-tahir A. Kettani K. Chaouch A. et al. Evaluation of the Bacteriological risk of solid Medical and Pharmaceutical waste from a Moroccan Hospital Center. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(6):2983-8. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00522.

10.   David R. Pullan JS. A Study to assess the knowledge, Attitude and Practice regarding household waste disposal among women, Chittattukara with a view to prepare an information leaflet. Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2021; 11(2):245-48. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-2996.2021.00058.6.

11.   Manoj Kumar T. Saravanan S. Reverse Logistic Practices on Household Medical Disposal in India and its Impacts on Environment. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2016; 6(2): 95-9. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-5691.2016.00016.2.

12.   Braver A. Khaire S. Knowledge, Attitude and Practices towards Covid-19 Outbreak in Maharashtra State. Int. J. of Advances in Nur. Management. 2021; 9(2):162-168. https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-2652.2021.00037.8.

13.   Goh Y. Tan BYQ. Bhartendu C. Ong JJY. et al. The face mask: How a real protection becomes a psychological symbol during Covid-19? Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020;88:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.060.

14.   Ma Q. Shan H.  Zhang C.  Zhang H. et al. Decontamination of face masks with steam for mask reuse in fighting the pandemic COVID‐19: Experimental supports. J Med Virol. 2020;92(10):1971–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25921.

15.   Fernandes M. Thakur RJ. Gavanje MS. A Study to assess knowledge regarding covid-19 among Nursing students. Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2021; 11(1):65-7. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-2996.2021.00017.3.

16.   Abdel Wahed WY. Hefzy  Em.  Ahmed MI.  Hamed NS.  Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perception of Health Care Workers Regarding COVID-19, A Cross-Sectional Study from Egypt. J Community Health. 2020;45(6):1242–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-020-00882-0.

17.   Hassan MM. Ahmed SA. Rahman KA. Biswas TK. Pattern of medical waste management: existing scenario in Dhaka City, Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-36.

18.   Alahdal H. Basingab F. Alotaibi R. An analytical study on the awareness, attitude and practice during the COVID-19 pandemic in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2020;13(10):1446–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.015.

19.   Yue S. Zhang J. Cao M. Chen B. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of COVID-19 Among Urban and Rural Residents in China: A Cross-sectional Study. J Community Health.2020;46(2):286 – 91.   https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10900-020-00877-x.

20.   Ahn H. Bailey CS. Rivers CS. Noonan KV. et al. Effect of older age on treatment decisions and outcomes among patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. CMAJ. 2015;187(12):873–80. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.150085.

21.   Canada H. COVID-19 medical masks and respirators: Overview [Internet]. aem. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/medical-devices/personal-protective-equipment/medical-masks-respirators.html

22.   Sharma SK. Mishra M. Mudgal SK. Efficacy of cloth face mask in prevention of novel coronavirus infection transmission: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Educ Health Promot. 2020;9:192. https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fjehp.jehp_533_20.

23.   Azap A. Erdinç FS. Medical mask or N95 respirator: When and how to use? Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50(SI-1):633–7. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2004-199.

24.   Using face masks in the community - Reducing COVID-19 transmission from potentially asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic people through the use of face masks [Internet]. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/using-face-masks-community-reducing-covid-19-transmission

25.   Mukerji S. MacIntyre CR. Seale H. Wang Q. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of N95 respirators and medical masks to protect healthcare workers in China from respiratory infections. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):464. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2564-9.

26.   Zhong B-L. Luo W. Li H. Zhang Q. et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(10):1745–52. https://doi.org/10.7150%2Fijbs.45221.

27.   Huynh G. Nguyen TN. Tran VK. Vo KN. et al. Knowledge and attitude toward COVID-19 among healthcare workers at District 2 Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2020;13(6):260. https://doi.org/10.2147%2FRMHP.S268876. 

28.   Sangkham S. Face mask and medical waste disposal during the novel COVID-19 pandemic in Asia. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering. 2020;2:100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100052.

29.   Schünemann HJ. Akl EA. Chou R. Chu DK. et al. Use of facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 2020;8(10):954–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30352-0.

30.   Sarker  MA. Harun-Or-Rashid M. Hirosawa T.  Abdul Hai MS. et al. Evaluation of Knowledge, Practices, and Possible Barriers among Healthcare Providers regarding Medical Waste Management in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:2590–7. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.890904.

31.   Azlan AA. Hamzah MR. Sern TJ. Ayub SH. et al. Public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia. PLoS One. 2020;15(5). e0233668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233668.

32.   Sunanda G. Ramaiah D. Sadiq MM. Narayana G. Impact of structured educational program on maternal knowledge, attitude, and practice toward diarrhea management in children <5 years age in Anantapur District. CHRISMED J Health Res. 2017;4:186-93. https://doi.org/10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_121_16.

33.   Sushitha U. Imran F. Sadiq MJ Vaasanthi P. et al. Recognising the Resistance Pattern of Micro-Organisms in the Subjects Admitted in the ICU – A Prospective, Observational Study. EC Microbiology. 2018; 14(6):283-92.

34.   Vigneshwaran E. Padmanabha Reddy Y. Devanna N. Development and validation of patient information leaflet for HIV/AIDS patients. Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2013; 6(1):41 – 6.

35.   Ahmed T. Abhilash A. Pramod RC. Fawaz P. et al. Comparison of Candidal Growth & Chlorhexidine Efficacy on Complete Denture-Biofilms of Patients with & without Denture Stomatitis - An in vivo Study. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2019;9:748-53.

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 14.10.2021            Modified on 09.07.2022

Accepted on 05.02.2023           © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2023; 16(9):4281-4287.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00701